<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Networking with Non-Binary Relationships</title>
	<atom:link href="http://buildingthesex.wordpress.com/2007/11/28/social-networking-with-non-binary-relationships/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://buildingthesex.wordpress.com/2007/11/28/social-networking-with-non-binary-relationships/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 18:38:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: futur:plom</title>
		<link>http://buildingthesex.wordpress.com/2007/11/28/social-networking-with-non-binary-relationships/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>futur:plom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buildingthesex.wordpress.com/2007/11/28/social-networking-with-non-binary-relationships/#comment-37</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Neo-Intimität, Neuformierung des Sozialen, &#8220;Freundschaft&#8221;?</strong></p>
<p>&#8230; Die Kategorie “Freundschaft” ist vielleicht zu eingleisig für Social Networks. Ein “doing away with the word “friend”, and allowing users to build their own taxonomy” schlägt Craig Ambrose als Antwort auf Cory Doctorow vor. Das wäre ein Ansatz: Das&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NelC</title>
		<link>http://buildingthesex.wordpress.com/2007/11/28/social-networking-with-non-binary-relationships/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>NelC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buildingthesex.wordpress.com/2007/11/28/social-networking-with-non-binary-relationships/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Mmm, how about a &#039;decay&#039; function? Over time, if you haven&#039;t interacted with someone, you lose ticks. Should probably be an inverse exponential relationship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmm, how about a &#8216;decay&#8217; function? Over time, if you haven&#8217;t interacted with someone, you lose ticks. Should probably be an inverse exponential relationship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
